David Roth is critical of Donald Trump, to be sure, but saves his most scathing critique for the journalists tasked with covering him, a view I share completely.

From The Cancer in the Camera Lens | The New Republic:

This is especially troubling because confusing and frightening things really are happening, every day. Thousands of Americans are dying, every day, from a disease that, as a quadruple-bylined survey in Science concluded, “acts like no pathogen humanity has ever seen.” For more than a month, state and federal leaders have edged up to suggesting that this is something the country might just play through, shedding thousands of lives every day in the name of the American Way and various industries’ bottom lines; states are already gearing up for this kamikaze response to an unreasoning virus. Trump is fixated on various numbers that he can watch go up or down and on not losing his reelection campaign; he fights to win the day because it’s all he knows and how he lives, and he’ll govern that way until he isn’t governing anymore. There is no leadership of any kind coming from the top of the government, and while it’s hard to say what the Democrats are doing, exactly, “leadership” surely isn’t the word for it. All of it, quite literally, is a matter of life and death. Right now, either out of instinct or inertia, the culture is tipping toward the latter.

And yet, as with the broken system that perpetually elevates what Trump says over what he does—the treacherous spectacle that puts him back in those presidential close-ups day after day—the obvious failure of it all has somehow not led to a change in course. The institutions that might help people understand a uniquely terrifying world instead turn, daily, back toward the uncomprehending pursuit of an idiot king’s vinegary whims. When a reporter from The Washington Post stammered out a question last week about Trump’s stance on disinfectant/sunlight injections, Trump was already leaning in, manifestly out over his skis and yet comfortably in his element. “I’m the president,” he said, “and you’re fake news.” Here is what he said after that: “It’s just a suggestion. From a brilliant lab, from a very very smart, perhaps brilliant man. He’s talking about sun, he’s talking about heat. And you see the numbers. That’s it, that’s all I have. I’m just here to present talent. I’m here to present ideas.” It’s not an answer, but it was enough to get him to the next question. Trump didn’t know the answer to that one, either, but someone was still waiting to ask it.

The media’s failure in this era is only matched by the President’s.

As a teenager, I always dreamed of working as a journalist. I loved radio, I loved storytelling, and I loved the idea of being on the front lines to witness and share important moments. I spent years chasing stories and interviewing newsmakers as a radio reporter in my 20s before moving into the realm of corporate communications. I still follow the business closely, because it’s still where my heart remains. Good journalism (and good journalists, of which there are too few) matter to the health of democracies and have great power to do good in the world. Unfortunately, a number of internal and external forces have conspired against journalism, leaving the industry fragmented, broke, and largely devoid of public trust.

Enter The Correspondent, a five-year-old Dutch startup that refuses advertising dollars and makes building trust with readers its north star. I first heard about The Correspondent from media critic, blogger and professor Jay Rosen on Twitter; I read up, and just minutes later made a donation.

The Correspondent sets itself apart by publishing its ten founding principles, which contain promises to be transparent, always put journalism ahead of profit, and never run any advertisements. The goal is to raise enough money — $2.5 million, to be exact — to launch a US version of the publication and provide an alternative to the advertiser-driven, click-baity and sensational content that makes up the overwhelming amount of our so-called “news”.

A team from The Correspondent is now pounding the pavement to reach its fundraising target before the deadline in mid-December. I have no idea if they’ll be successful, or even if the final product will live up to expectations — but I applaud them for trying.  We are living in a rapidly changing world in which trust in our institutions is eroding and the truth is becoming a matter of opinion. For the good of journalism — and the United States — I hope The Correspondent succeeds.

You can make a donation here.